Now
let’s talk about verse 4, addressing “fathers.” Literally that’s whom Paul is
addressing: Fathers. Now, does this mean that what he says doesn’t apply at all to mothers? No, it can. And the original language can apply to both parents (in the same
way that “brothers” in the N.T. usually is referring to believers of both
sexes). But I think that fathers
particularly need to listen to this.
In the 1st century when
this was written, and throughout history right up until the present day,
fathers/husbands were considered to have absolute authority over those living
in their home. Their word was law and never to be questioned by anyone living
under their roof, including wives, not to mention children. This is something
we didn’t go into with much detail before, but it’s something to consider. For
him to command husbands to love their wives, to be willing to die for them, to
treat them with gentleness and compassion and kindness, etc., was incredibly
countercultural for that time. If a husband raped his wife, that was
considered his right. If he beat her, well, obviously she deserved it. If he
divorced her and threw her out with nothing, well, that’s his prerogative. Same
things with one’s children: Severe beatings by one’s father were often par for
the course. So for Paul to call upon fathers to give any consideration of
their children’s feelings, to prescribe any limitations on how fathers can
treat their children would be revolutionary. We need to see just how radical
his message was.
So what does he tell fathers? “[Do]
not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and
instruction of the Lord.” How can a father exasperate his children?
Well, off the top of my head? I’d
venture some suggestions:
·
Capriciousness,
not sticking to the same set of rules, not knowing what he’ll do.
·
Hypocrisy.
Wow, this is a big one! If a son sees his father tell him to something while
not doing it himself, that'll build up anger like nothing else.
·
Not
showing compassion and mercy when appropriate.
·
Being
quick to anger, slow to forgive.
·
Punishing
out of a sense of retribution, not out of a desire for discipline. A judge is
there to dish out punishment. A
father is there to discipline his
child, to make him better.
Do
you see a pattern here? A father on earth is supposed to model
himself after our Heavenly Father.
As
he does frequently in sections like this, he presents instructions in
antithesis of each other: Don’t exasperate (some translations render it as “provoke
to anger”) your children; instead,
bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord. What does this mean?
Not rocket science, folks:
·
Read
the Bible to and with them. Talk about the Bible
with them. Once they get old enough, teach them to apply God’s word and to think
things through biblically.
·
Pray
over them and with them. Teach them by example to pray.
·
This
might be the most important part: Let them see you do things God’s way.
I know you’re not perfect; none of us are. But they must see that as the general
pattern of your life. Otherwise, your Bible teaching will do little but
“exasperate” them.
·
And
when you screw up, as you will, seek their forgiveness, as you would with any
brother you’ve offended. Part of the “training and instruction in the Lord” is
knowing when you’ve fallen into sin and seeking forgiveness from 1) the Lord,
and 2) anyone who might have been harmed by what you’ve done.
Whether
you’re a parent or just somebody’s child, there’s something for everybody here.
The Bible’s really an equal-opportunity offender, isn’t it?
No comments:
Post a Comment