Today we’re wrapping up Paul’s
discussion on “disputable matters.” When the Bible is silent or more ambiguous on
an issue, we need to recognize that fact. If another Christian disagrees with
us on something like this, we need to respond with love, accommodation,
patience, and humility. If you’re on the “abstain from X” side, you need to
avoid judging your brother. If you’re on the “X is OK” side, then you need to
avoid looking down on your brother who disagrees with you. There’s an aphorism
I’d like to introduce: “In essentials, unity; in doubtful things, liberty; in
all things, charity.” Apparently this was introduced
by Archbishop Marco Antonio de Dominis, and popularized by the Puritan preacher
Richard Baxter. Whatever the source, it’s a great summarization of Paul’s
teaching here.
Let’s take a moment to bring this
into the modern world. The once-important controversy about whether or not
Christians should or shouldn’t eat meat sacrificed to idols is pretty moot at
this point, right? So what might be modern equivalents? Well, off the top of my
head, I’d submit A) Going to ‘R’-rated movies, and B) Drinking alcohol.
I’ve had really dear siblings in
Christ who were adamant that going to any R-rated movie is sinful, and I really
respect their desire to be holy and pleasing to our Lord. They’ve had me really
reexamine my commitment to my Savior. Here’s my response: You might make a case
that it’s not a good idea, but unless you can find the words “R-rated” or “movie”
in your exhaustive concordance, you can’t say that it’s categorically sinful
like adultery or theft. Now, if watching any
movie leads you to think sinful thoughts or speak sinful words, then obviously
that’s more than enough reason to abstain. If it leads you closer to Christ,
then it’s good. If not, then it’s not. For myself, I really avoid movies with nudity or anything that will lead me into lust or sexual desire for anyone besides my wife, no matter what their rating.
Regarding alcohol, let me quote C.
S. Lewis: “Of course it may be the duty of a particular Christian, or of any
Christian, at a particular time, to abstain from strong drink, either because
he is the sort of man who cannot drink at all without drinking too much, or
because he is with people who are inclined to drunkenness and must not
encourage them by drinking himself. But the whole point is that he is
abstaining, for a good reason, from something which he does not condemn and
which he likes to see other people enjoying. One of the marks of a certain type
of bad man is that he cannot give up a thing himself without wanting everyone
else to give it up. That is not the Christian way. An individual Christian may see
fit to give up all sorts of things for special reasons--marriage, or meat, or
beer, or the cinema; but the moment he starts saying the things are bad in
themselves, or looking down his nose at other people who use them, he has taken
the wrong turning.” I think that sums it up beautifully.
However. . . in American society, which commonly sees alcohol not as a beverage you drink with your meal but as source of a "buzz," I take that "tipping the scale" consideration as the main reason not to drink in public.
However. . . in American society, which commonly sees alcohol not as a beverage you drink with your meal but as source of a "buzz," I take that "tipping the scale" consideration as the main reason not to drink in public.
I’d like to wrap up this discussion
with the last reason why Paul’s calling for charity on both sides of issues
like this: Christ. Christ, the Son who took on human flesh and died in our
place, gave up his rights and privileges for our benefit. Yes, we have
beautiful freedom in Christ, but our freedom is not the most important
consideration here. Glorifying the Father and a love for people will lead us to
lay aside our “rights” if necessity dictates.
What’s Paul’s point in vss. 8-13? He
starts out by telling us to accept one another and strive for harmony and unity
as much as possible, and then launches into a series of O.T. quotations. What
do these latter verses have to do with the earlier ones, the discussion about
disputable matters?
Think of it this way: Jesus laid
down his rights and privileges—“who,
though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be
grasped”—and what was the result? His first generation of followers were all
Jewish, but that quickly changed. Paul quotes from the Torah (Deuteronomy), the
Psalms, and the Prophets in order to show the result of this submission to the
Father’s will: A worldwide movement of Gentiles of every race, nationality,
ethnicity, language, and tribe worshiping and praising and submitting to the
Lord alongside their Jewish siblings.
That’s why in vs. 7 he tells us to “accept
one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God.” When we’re willing to lay aside
our “rights,” there’s no telling how the Lord will use that to bring others to
him and increase his praise. I once heard that evangelists and missionaries are
“worship recruiters,” and there’s a lot of truth to that. It’s not about you,
and it’s not about me, it’s about him. Please remember that.
Lord Jesus, it is all about you, and I tend
to forget that at times. I cling to my “rights” so tightly they burn me. If you
clung to your rights like I cling to mine, I’d be lost forever. I want you not
just as my Savior, but as my example. I’m your follower, and I need to
demonstrate that better. By your grace, I will.
No comments:
Post a Comment